Improvement Clinical Skill Through the Implementation of Mini-CEX among Nursing Student
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33746/fhj.v7i03.177Keywords:
Clinical Skill; Mini-Cex; NursingAbstract
Lack of nursing competencies in Indonesia is still happened. The university or nursing high school who provided nursing education is one who responsible on this situation. Nursing skill should be achieved by nursing student to improve clinical skills. Mini-CEX is one of method which can be improve nursing student’s skilss. Objective of this study to identify effectiveness of mini-CEX on improvement nursing student’s clinical skills. Quasi experiment was conducted to reach 49 nursing student divide to 25 student as an intevention group and 24 student as a control group by total sampling. Mini-CEX form was applied to measure clinical skill. This study found that nursing student’s clinical skills before and after intervention was signficant different with pvalue =0.000 (< 0.05). After student getting feedback, they were improve their skills (Mean=35.24), this showed that significant different from before intervention (Mean= 25.56). Therefore, Mini-CEX is a great clinical evaluation method to encourage and help student for improving their clinical skills. Mini-CEX should be applied contuniously in hospital.
Downloads
References
Abdilah. (2016). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kelulusan Uji Kompetensi Ners Indonesia. J. Penelit. Adm. Publik, 2, 373–380.
AIPNI. (2014). Materi Pelatihan Preceptorship (tidak dipublikasikan). Yogyakarta : STIKes Almaata (in Bahasa Indonesia).
Al Ansari A., Ali, S.K., & Donnon, T. The construct and criterion validity of the mini-CEX: a meta-analysis of the published research. Acad Med. 2013, 88 (3) : 413 - 420. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e318280a953
Djuria, S.A., & Afandi, M. (2013). Development of measurement tool Mini-CEX (Mini Clinical Evaluation) as an evaluation tool of nursing students in teaching hospital of Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta. GSTF International Journal of Nursing and Health Care (JNHC), 1(1): 127-132.
Habibi, H., Khaghanizade, M., Ebadi, A., & Sayedmazhari, M. 2013. Comparison of the Effect of Modern Assesment Methods (DOPS and Mini-CEX) with traditional method on Nursing students’Clinical Skills : A Randomized Trial. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 13(5) :364-372.
Huang, S. Y. (2015). The Experience Of MiniClinical Evaluation. BMJ Open , A1–
A53.
Kemenristek DIKTI. ( 2018). Data Statistik Pendaftar lulus dan tidak lulus.Registrasi Online Uji Kompetensi NERS.
Kuo, C.L., Shou, J.P., Maw, S.L., Chih, W.Y., & H, P.K. (2013). Develompment and implementation of a mini-clinical evaluation exercise (Mini-CEX) program to asses the clinical competencies of internal medicine residents: from faculty development to curriculum evaluation. BMC Medical Education, 13 (13): 1472-1476.
Lita, B.F. (2013). Comparison of perceptions of nursing internship program and preseptor on Mini-CEX implementation in Education Hospital. Underthesis. Muhammadiyah University of Yogyakarta.
Moghadam, F.A., Sahebalzamani, M., Fatemah, M., Farahani, H., & Gharabagh, Z.A. (2016). A comparative analysis of the effect of Mini-CEX and conventional assesment methods on clinical skill ini anesthesiology students of School of Paramedicine, Hamedan University of Medical Sciences. Journal of Advances in Medical Education (JAMED), 1 (3): 60-68.
Sudarso, S., Rahayu, G. R., & Suhoyo, Y. (2016). How does feedback in mini-CEX
affect students’ learning response? International Journal of Medical Education, 7, 407-413, https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.580b.363d
WHO.(2011). Panduan Pembelajaran Praktik Klinik Kebidanan dengan Pendekatan Preceptorship dan Mentorship. Jakarta: Pusat Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Tenaga Kesehatan.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly cited.
